It is easy to walk past something like this without registering what it is: a low, irregular ring of tumbled stone slabs, barely a metre high at its tallest point, measuring roughly 4.6 metres across its longer axis and only about 2 metres across its shorter one. The wall appears to have been open at the north-east, suggesting a deliberate entrance rather than simple collapse, and the overall form is subcircular, the kind of modest, functional shape that speaks more to shelter and practicality than to ceremony.

The site sits within what has been identified as an extensive multiperiod field system, meaning the land around it preserves traces of enclosures, boundaries, and cultivation from several different eras laid one over another. That wider landscape context matters here: this small hut site is not an isolated curiosity but one element within a complex of remains suggesting that this high ground was used, organised, and returned to over a long stretch of time. The enclosure was identified by Tom Coffey and Paul Walsh, whose fieldwork brought it into the formal record. The views it commands open wide to the south, while higher ground rises to the north, giving the site a particular relationship with its surroundings that would have made it a practical, if exposed, place to shelter or work from.