That distinction matters. Farmers clearing fields of stone tend to produce untidy, irregular heaps; this mound is roughly circular, measuring about fourteen metres north to south and eleven and a half metres east to west, with a flattened and slightly concave top roughly four to five metres across. It rises to just over a metre at its southern edge. Whatever it is, it was not casually assembled.

The mound's origins remain genuinely uncertain. Whether it is built primarily of earth or stone, or some combination of both, has not been established, and its smooth grass covering gives little away. A faint linear feature crosses it on an east to west axis, though its significance is unclear. Around the base, remnants of old field boundaries press in from the west and north, suggesting that later agricultural activity has gradually encroached on whatever buffer of space once surrounded it. A grassed-over trackway, between four and seven metres wide and edged with sod-covered stones, runs along its southern side. The mound does not sit in isolation; an enclosure lies roughly one hundred metres to the south-east, and a possible cashel, the term for a stone-walled circular fort of early medieval Ireland, sits approximately one hundred and twenty-five metres to the south-west. That clustering of features on the same low rise hints at a landscape that was organised and inhabited over a long period, even if the specific history of this particular mound has yet to be worked out.