What makes this site particularly interesting is its doubled structure: a large outer enclosure nearly thirty metres across contains a second, smaller circular enclosure at its centre, roughly thirteen metres in diameter. This kind of cashel, the Irish term for a ringfort defined by stone walls rather than earthen banks, already speaks to an organised use of the landscape, but the presence of a concentric inner enclosure suggests something more deliberate, possibly a distinction between domestic or agricultural space and a more protected inner area.

The outer wall, up to two metres thick in places and still standing around eighty centimetres above the interior ground level, is partially grass-covered, as is the inner bank. Along part of the northern arc, a later stone field boundary has been built directly on top of the earlier wall, which is a common fate for prehistoric and early medieval enclosures in agricultural landscapes: the stone was simply too useful, or too conveniently placed, to ignore. One detail that rewards attention is the way the interior has been deliberately raised on the southern side to compensate for the natural fall of the hillslope, creating a level platform within. That kind of earthmoving was not incidental; it reflects a considered effort to make the enclosed space functional and even, regardless of the terrain outside it.