It has no tower, no signage, and no dramatic elevation. What it has instead is a quiet persistence, surviving in the landscape long enough to be catalogued by archaeologists, then half-forgotten again, cut through by a drainage ditch and parcelled up along a townland boundary.

The site was recorded by the archaeologist Seán P. Ó Ríordáin, who designated it 'Site B' on a plan of the area around Cush. Earthworks of this kind, low banks or ditches shaped by human hand, could have served any number of purposes depending on their date and context, from enclosing a settlement or livestock to marking territory or defining a ritual space. What the plan shows is a semi-circular form, the southern portion of which has been cut through by a drainage ditch or stream running east to west. That watercourse does double duty as the townland boundary between Cush and the neighbouring townland of Moorestown, meaning the earthwork now straddles two administrative divisions, the kind of accident that can complicate any attempt to understand a site as a whole. The poorly drained ground it sits in is itself a clue worth noting; low-lying, wet land was often avoided for permanent settlement, which raises quiet questions about what this feature was actually for.

For anyone wanting to locate it, Ó Ríordáin's original plan remains a useful reference point, and a faint trace of the earthwork is said to be detectable on Google Earth orthoimages if you know where to look and what to look for, though the signal is subtle. On the ground, the feature would be easy to miss, particularly in summer when vegetation obscures low earthen banks. The townland boundary and the drainage ditch running east to west across the southern arc of the feature are the clearest landmarks for orientation. Waterproof footwear would be advisable given the ground conditions.