House - 16th/17th century, Rath (Balrothery East By.), Co. Dublin
Co. Dublin |
House
Some places survive in the historical record as little more than a rumour of themselves.
In the townland of Rath, within the old barony of Balrothery East in County Dublin, there exists, or once existed, a house dating to the sixteenth or seventeenth century. What makes it unusual is not any feature of its architecture or any drama attached to its owners, but rather the nature of what we do not know. Its precise location has never been established. It is a building that has, in effect, slipped off the map.
The sole documentary evidence for this structure comes from the Down Survey of 1655 to 1656, which records a dwelling on or near this ground. The Down Survey was a remarkable undertaking commissioned by the Cromwellian administration to map the forfeited lands of Ireland in extraordinary detail, providing the basis for the redistribution of property following the wars of the 1640s. Compiled under the direction of Sir William Petty, it remains one of the most ambitious cartographic exercises of seventeenth-century Europe. That a dwelling is noted in the survey suggests the building was standing and considered significant enough to record at the time of mapping, placing its construction somewhere in the late Tudor or early Stuart period. Beyond that single reference, compiled here by researcher Geraldine Stout and uploaded to the record in August 2011, the house leaves no further trace.
There is, practically speaking, nothing to visit. Rath is a quiet area of north County Dublin, and without a confirmed location, any attempt to find the building's remains would be speculative. The interest here lies less in standing stones or surviving walls and more in the exercise of considering what the Down Survey represents: a snapshot of a landscape mid-transformation, full of structures that would not survive the following centuries. For anyone with an interest in the early modern period or in the methodology of historical mapping, the Survey itself, accessible through various digitised archives, repays close attention. The entry for this dwelling is a reminder that absence from the landscape does not always mean absence from the record, and that a single line in a seventeenth-century document can be all that anchors a building to existence.