Ringfort (Rath), Ballynoe, Co. Limerick
Co. Limerick |
Ringforts
There is something quietly humbling about a monument that has, for all practical purposes, ceased to exist above ground.
The rath at Ballynoe in County Limerick occupies low-lying, gently undulating pasture, and when inspectors visited the site to assess its condition, the monument was simply not evident. No visible bank, no obvious earthwork, no clear perimeter. What remains on record is essentially a cartographic ghost, preserved by its entry in the national monuments register and by its appearance on the 1924 Ordnance Survey six-inch map, which indicated an incomplete sub-rectangular platform measuring approximately 50 metres east to west and 40 metres north to south, defined from the north-east to the west by a scarped edge. A rath, broadly speaking, is an early medieval enclosed farmstead, typically circular or oval in plan and surrounded by one or more earthen banks and ditches, though the Ballynoe example appears to have diverged from that norm in both shape and survival.
The site came under particular scrutiny in the early 2000s when a proposed gas pipeline between Barnakyle and Coonagh West, County Limerick, passed in its vicinity. A desk-based assessment confirmed that the construction wayleave, the corridor of land granted for the pipeline's passage, would come no closer than approximately 20 metres west of the recorded monument, meaning no direct physical impact was anticipated. Archaeologists were cautious nonetheless. Subsurface remains associated with a registered monument can extend well beyond any visible surface trace, and so eight test trenches were excavated across the relevant portion of the wayleave. The work was carried out by Dermot Nelis and published in the Gas Pipeline to the West report, Section 4, produced by Margaret Gowen and Co. in 2003. The trenches revealed neither subsurface features nor portable finds of any kind.
For anyone with a particular interest in the archaeology of the Shannon corridor, Ballynoe is the kind of site that rewards attention precisely because of its ambiguity. There is nothing to see in the conventional sense, and the surrounding pasture gives little away. The value lies in knowing that something was once mapped here, that a community of early medieval farmers probably enclosed a portion of this same flat ground, and that when the landscape was tested carefully, even the buried evidence had faded beyond detection. The 1924 OS six-inch map remains the most informative document associated with the site, and consulting it alongside a visit to the general area gives a clearer sense of what the recorded monument was once thought to represent.